Of Course The Clinton Camp Is Sending Out Feelers to Kissinger–They’re Friends

Charles Pierce, on hearing that the Clinton campaign is trying to get an endorsement from none other than Henry Fucking Kissinger (boldface mine):

If Hillary Clinton actively seeks, or publicly accepts, the endorsement of Henry Kissinger, I will vote for Gary Johnson and Bill Weld on November 8. (Jill Stein, you might’ve been a contender, but going off to Red Square to talk about Vladimir Putin and human rights? Being an honored guest of a Russian propaganda channel? I don’t think so.) Kissinger is a bridge too far. He is responsible for more unnecessary deaths than any official of a putative Western democracy since the days when Lord John Russell was starving the Irish, if not the days when President Andy Jackson was inaugurating the genocide of the Cherokee. He should be coughing his life away as an inmate at The Hague, not whispering in the ears of a putatively progressive Democratic presidential candidate. I can tolerate (somewhat) the notion of her reaching out to the rest of the wax museum there, but Kissinger is a monster too far. He is my line in the sand. I can choose who I endorse to lead my country, a blessing that Henry Kissinger worked his whole career to deny to too many people.

But this, as Mother Jones reported a while ago, should come as a surprise to no one (boldface mine):

What Clinton did not mention [in a debate with Sen. Sanders] was that her bond with Kissinger was personal as well as professional, as she and her husband have for years regularly spent their winter holidays with Kissinger and his wife, Nancy, at the beachfront villa of fashion designer Oscar de la Renta, who died in 2014, and his wife, Annette, in the Dominican Republic…

This gathering of the Clintons, the Kissingers, and the de la Rentas seems to occur most years. In 2011, de la Renta, a native of the Dominican Republic, told Vogue that he built this seaside estate so he could host his close friends, and he cited the Kissingers and Clintons as examples. “At Christmas,” he said, “we’re always in the same group.

Ugh. There is not a single clause in the highlighted part of the first paragraph that is not nauseating.

To be certain, Trump would be far, far worse than Clinton (and so one holds his or her nose and votes), but getting Kissinger’s endorsement would be off-putting. It’s this simple: good people do not consider Henry Kissinger to be a friend.

Just so everyone’s eyes are wide-open come November 8, 2016.

This entry was posted in Basic Human Decency, Democrats, Ethics. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Of Course The Clinton Camp Is Sending Out Feelers to Kissinger–They’re Friends

  1. I brought this up on a progressive/leftish site and was told that Hillary’s friendship with Kissinger meant nothing about her foreign policy outlook because Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Scalia were friends, so there!

  2. Net Denizen says:

    Also don’t forget how liberal Hillary’s reign is going to be, despite evidence to the contrary suggesting that she’s as center-right as her husband on most issues. I predict a similar phenomenon to Obama’s first term where people on the left get their hopes up that Hillary, by simple virtue of being a Democrat, will pursue an agenda they believe in only to face disappointment as she strictly refuses to be the populist they imagined her to be.

  3. DMC says:

    You have to wonder about Pierce, sometimes. I mean, you knew she was a Clinton when you picked her up!

Comments are closed.