Monthly Archives: March 2017

Links 3/31/17

Links for you. Science: Predatory journals recruit fake editor Ex CDC Director: History Proves the Dangers of Underfunded Health Programs The White House calls climate change research a ‘waste.’ Actually, it’s required by law FISHY BUSINESS: Accusations of research fraud … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized

In Case You Missed It…

…a week of Mad Biologist posts (actually, two weeks! Cuz we missed one): Resisting Schadenfreude In A Time Of Trump–The Healthcare Edition Trump Thinks The NIH Is “Terrible” The Fiscal Unsustainability Of Sprawl NIH And Coal Mining More On Bogus … Continue reading

Posted in Weekly Roundup

How Is This Different From Any Other Republican Policy Initiative?

Mark Schmitt is very despondent about the meaning of the failed Republican healthcare ‘plan’ (boldface mine): Yet we should also take a few minutes to be angry, furious even, about the sad last act of this long political showdown, one … Continue reading

Posted in Conservatives | 2 Comments

Links 3/30/17

Links for you. Science: Killing Science and Culture Doesn’t Make the Nation Stronger Science march on Washington, billed as historic, plagued by organizational turmoil How Did Sabercats Use Those Outlandish Fangs? “Paging Dr. Fraud”: The Fake Publishers That Are Ruining … Continue reading

Posted in Lotsa Links | 1 Comment

The Rise In White Drug Abuse Deaths Is Long-Term And Gradual

There has been a lot of chatter about a recent Case and Deaton paper and follow-on media interviews which ascribe the increase in white working class mortality to ‘diseases of despair.’ Interesting how, when the white working class gets hammered, … Continue reading

Posted in Drugs | 3 Comments

Links 3/29/17

Links for you. Science: The Case of the Dead Dog, the Bullet, and the Geneticist Who Solved It NOAA Cuts Could Stymie Research, Put Lives at Risk Why the Math Curriculum Makes No Sense Is our media learning medical reporting? … Continue reading

Posted in Lotsa Links | 1 Comment

Democrats Shouldn’t Worry About The ‘Fairness’ Of Filibustering Gorsuch For SCOTUS

They really shouldn’t: The implication of this claim, though, is that if Hillary Clinton wins the election, Republicans will give her latitude to appoint a reasonably well-qualified, non-extreme jurist to the vacant spot. I have long been skeptical that Republicans … Continue reading

Posted in Conservatives, Democrats | 1 Comment