Urban Governance: It’s the Executive Branch, Stupid

And in too many cities, the executive branch is failing its citizens. There are two posts from Joe Friday, both of which highlight what some asshole with a blog has been writing for a long time: many of the failures of governance in cities are executive branch failures (i.e., mayors). Obviously #NotAllMayors, and there is always room for improvement in the legislature (e.g., city councils), but it’s the executive branch which just isn’t providing the services it’s supposed to provide–and which we pay for and need.

As Joe Friday notes, on the criminal justice side of things, D.C. has seen a precipitous drop in murders this year (down thirty percent), and all of that happened before Congressional interference or the D.C. Council’s new crime bill. So what happened? Well, the MPD decided to start arresting people for violent crimes and the federally-appointed federal prosecutors decided to prosecute some of them*. Violent crime arrests increased 121 percent. The key thing is there was no change in staffing (if anything, staffing dropped by three percent). This was the MPD deciding to do their jobs. Likewise, the federal prosecutors actually prosecuted more than 33% of their cases. The question is why wasn’t this done sooner–and, again, the Council has very little role in these kinds of decisions.

Meanwhile, on the social safety net side of things, there are still a lot of failures (boldface mine):

While the funding issues can be laid at the feet of the Council–the power of the purse is their job, after all, these administrative failures are executive branch failures, which is to say, Mayor Bowser’s failures. I’m under no illusions that replacing Bowser would solve all of our problems, but her inability to solve many of these problems after nine years in the Mayor’s office indicates she is unable to do so.

Part of the problem is that, in most cities, the (usually Democratic) primary is the ‘real’ election, and very few people vote in that. Those eligible voters that do vote often do not represent the community as a whole, meaning that many essential services are neglected. It doesn’t help that the media coverage (at least in D.C.) is underfunded, and, in the case of the Washington Post, mediocre, especially on the opinion side (which gets read more than the news reporting).

That said, if national Democrats want to shore up support for themselves in urban areas, they need to bring pressure on their fellow local Democrats to improve executive branch functioning.

*The mainland colony of the District of Columbia does not have the authority to appoint its prosecutors. Instead, they are federal prosecutors who are appointed by presidents and approved by the (sanctimonious) Senate. Unofficially, it’s an open secret that they don’t like prosecuting lesser charges that don’t result in jail time, but there’s nothing we colonials can do about that, other than pester them.

This entry was posted in DC, Democrats. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Urban Governance: It’s the Executive Branch, Stupid

  1. Pingback: Links 4/26/24 | Mike the Mad Biologist

Comments are closed.