One Way Federal Policy Can Influence Local Housing Zoning For The Better

A couple of weeks ago, Minneapolis passed legislation banning single-family zoning. Here’s what that means (boldface mine):

Opening up Minneapolis’ wealthiest, most exclusive districts to triplexes, the theory goes, will create new opportunities for people to move for schools or a job, provide a way for aging residents to downsize without leaving their neighborhoods, help ease the affordability crunch citywide, and stem the displacement of lower-income residents in gentrifying areas. Homeownership in Minneapolis diverges along racial lines, with minority groups’ rates lagging between 20 and 35 percentage points behind that of whites. More rental supply citywide, in addition to a new $40 million slice of the budget for affordable housing, is expected to help tenants find a foothold. The mayor, for what it’s worth, is a renter himself—maybe the first tenant-mayor in the history of a city where (like in most American cities) the majority of people live in rental housing.

In my own home city of D.C., significant swathes of the city have mandatory single-family zoning, including areas near Metro stations:

dc_zoom_(1)
Yellow areas are single-family only zones, brown is all other; green is parkland.

Despite this success, there is a great deal of concern about how to make this national. Will every battle have to be city by city? It seems to me that the mortgage interest deduction offers an opportunity here. Simply, any single-family in a census tract not defined as rural (< 1,000 people/sq. mile) would not receive the mortgage interest tax deduction. This isn’t telling people what to do with their property, and no one is showing up to knock your house down. But there’s no reason why it should be illegal–and why that policy should be subsidized with federal dollars–to build a duplex or a triplex. Do what you what with the property–and buy what you want too–but if you’re contributing to the housing shortage, renters don’t need to subsidize that.

This entry was posted in Housing, Taxes, Urban Planning. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to One Way Federal Policy Can Influence Local Housing Zoning For The Better

  1. itsathought2 says:

    Another benefit is that multi-family housing tends to be less of a carbon footprint.
    And of course Zoning is just another form of institutional racism and classism.

  2. Jeff Dutky says:

    you say that a bunch of area with close metro access is zoned for single family units, but the only area I see on the map (in DC) that seems to indicate that is the western leg of the red line, and I have some doubts about the accuracy there: my impression is that most of the length of Wisconsin and Connecticut Avenues are fronted by large apartment (or condo) buildings, rather than single family homes, at least compared to the upper reaches of 16th street. Sure, we could fit a lot more people in the residential wasteland between Wisconsin and Connecticut Avenues, but the immediate environs of the metro stations are pretty high density already.

Leave a Reply. Comments with more than 3 links will be held for moderation

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.