How to Publish Peer Reviewed Creationist ‘Research’

Slate has the goods on the style manual for Answers Research Journal, which is “a professional, peer-reviewed technical journal for the publication of interdisciplinary scientific and other relevant research from the perspective of the recent Creation and the global Flood within a biblical framework.” One problem with the Slate commentary: many peer-reviewed journals allow authors to suggest reviewers, provided there are no conflicts of interest. It’s still pretty funny though:

As an extra incentive to participate, those with “a reason for not wanting their biographical details publicized on the AiG website” (such as seeking tenure at an institution with more rigorous notions about scholarship) may use a “pen name” (Page 2). In a recent ARJ microbe forum, two “independent scholars” (purportedly, Ph.D.s at “prominent research facilities in the eastern part of North America”) submitted abstracts under the pseudonyms “Luke Kim” and “Ira Loucks” because they “prefer to keep their creationist credentials hidden for the moment until they achieve more seniority.”

It’s like little children dressing up in their parents’ clothes in the attic….

This entry was posted in Creationism, The War on Science. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to How to Publish Peer Reviewed Creationist ‘Research’

  1. Joshua says:

    Hmm. Do you have to use the “Blogging About Peer-Reviewed Research” tag/icon when rebutting ARJ articles? 😉

  2. sparc says:

    Hmm. Do you have to use the “Blogging About Peer-Reviewed Research” tag/icon when rebutting ARJ articles?

    No: Curch burning Ebola boys provides an icon with which discussions of pseudo-scientific ID-creationism crap may be labelled as “Blogging on Pseudo-Scientific Douche-Bags”.

  3. magic says:

    very thanks for article

Comments are closed.