Bad Service Leads To Low Ridership: The Orange Line Edition

It’s pretty clear that D.C. Metro’s horrible weekend service has led to a massive decline in weekend ridership–and it accounts for a disproportionate amount of the total loss in riders since the beginning of SafeTrack, WMATA’s attempt to repair the Metro which began in 2014 (following this blog’s convention, we do not recognize that SafeTrack ever ended in any meaningful sense). People familiar with Metro will know that the Orange Line has been especially hard hit by the repair schedule, and, according to a study by the D.C. Policy Center, ridership is down, down, down:

3-Orange-line-overview

And the drop is happening at every Orange Line station, including those that don’t get a lot of use:

OR-all
(the original study has an embiggened version)

The study concludes:

Additional service from the Silver Line and mode-shift in response to delays appear to explain the more recent losses in Orange Line ridership to the west. Along the Orange Line’s eastern end (where ridership has never been particularly high to begin with), the largest overall drops have been at the New Carrollton terminus, where riders might be particularly sensitive to service disruptions and other issues that lengthen their already-long commutes.

Some of these factors, such as the Silver Line’s effect on West Falls Church, appear to be specific to the Orange Line. However, others—including the large drop in ridership at New Carrollton—likely reflect riders’ reaction to more systemic problems. To address these underlying issues, WMATA should prioritize measures which improve reliability and increase overall trunk line throughput, not only to retain but also to grow ridership. This would include looking at increasing the capacity of buses: Two of the cities which gained ridership in 2016, Houston and Seattle, did so following a reconfiguration of their bus network to focus on the highest-ridership routes. This is something that Metro may wish to analyze further, particularly with its routes close to the I-66 corridor in the case of the Orange Line. Other stakeholders, such as the D.C. government, should likewise ensure that investment decisions prioritize overall ridership growth and benefits to the system as a whole. It would also be worth examining whether direct bus routes to outlying areas where low-income employment has increased, or other mobility improvements, would be worthwhile.

It is also possible that Metrorail’s overall maintenance dilemma is modestly exacerbating changes to employment locations. If commuters are finding Metrorail service unreliable, they may have been forced to take jobs in other, less accessible locations (and, by extension, purchase or use automobiles, adding to cost burdens.) This possibility reinforces the need for WMATA to move forward on state of good repair improvements, and to ensure reliable, frequent service to meet the District and the region’s mobility needs.

The Orange Line is perhaps the most sensitive to service problems: even small delays can make getting from Virginia, especially if one is making connections, far more difficult. And Virginia has always been the most difficult state partner to wrangle when it comes to budgets. This is not helping.

This entry was posted in DC, Transportation. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Bad Service Leads To Low Ridership: The Orange Line Edition

  1. zero says:

    For my commute, the absurd 45-day red line shutdown led me to finally try MARC. On a monthly pass I pay less than $3 per trip. I always have a seat and have only had one delay of a few minutes. It means i walk an extra ~2km per day from Union station to work and back, but there is a shuttle for bad weather days.

    When red line service is restored, I will continue riding MARC. So sick of the crush, the broken escalators, messed up train cars, ‘train out of service’ repeated fifty times with flickering lights, etc.

    I already use uber on weekends instead of metro for family outings; it’s more convenient and still manages to be cheaper most of the time.

    I like the idea of metro and I want it to succeed. I’m willing to tolerate a lot of inconvenience. If even I am unwilling to stick it out at this point, how is metro going to pick up new riders?

Leave a Reply. Comments with more than 3 links will be held for moderation

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.