Anti-GMO Or Anti-Corporation?

There’s an interesting New Yorker article about using CRISPR and gene drives to solve various problems. But what I found interesting was this part (boldface mine):

For Esvelt, though, those achievements seem almost like secondary benefits. “For a lot of people, the goal is to eradicate malaria, and I am behind that a hundred per cent,” he said. “The agricultural people have the New World screwworm”—a particularly destructive pest also known as the blowfly—“they’d love to get rid of in South America. Everyone has a thing he really wants to do. And it makes sense. But I would submit that the single most important application of gene drive is not to eradicate malaria or schistosomiasis or Lyme or any other specific project. It is to change the way we do science.”

That is the message that Esvelt has been selling in his talks throughout the world, and the initial response, on Nantucket and Martha’s Vineyard—even from people who attended the meetings in order to object to the proposal—has been overwhelmingly positive. “I came here thinking I would say, ‘Absolutely not,’ ” Danica Connors, an herbalist and shamanic practitioner who opposes genetically modified products, said at the Nantucket meeting. “I am the first person to say that, tinker with Mother Nature, we are going to break it.” But she told Esvelt that she loved “the fact that you are a young scientist saying, ‘I want this to be a non-corporate thing and I want this to be about the people.’ ” Seeming to surprise even herself, she said, “You know, I want to see where you go with this. I am actually very excited.”

I think a significant part of the opposition to various GMOs has little to do with the technology and mostly to do with distrust of corporations who want to cash in on it (whether that distrust is valid or not is an entirely separate debate). To the extent those who use these technologies aren’t seen as profiting from it (or ridiculously so) and are also viewed as solving real problems, these technologies will become more popular.

This entry was posted in Genetics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Anti-GMO Or Anti-Corporation?

  1. preaction says:

    This sounds like yet another good reason why we need public (government-funded) scientific research grants.

  2. Net Denizen says:

    Also, some of the means GMO is used in the name of solving problems seems to create its own set of problems. Like the GMO corn that was supposed to eliminate rootworm but which has instead produced much stronger, more resilient rootworm. And the new proposal to release thousands upon thousands of GMO mosquitos to fight Zika carrying mosquitos. What could possibly go wrong?

Comments are closed.