Mike,
This is ScienceBlogs, not myspace. You’re dragging science down with this sort of unfunny immaturity. Please stick to freshman-who-just-read-Nietzsche critiques of other people’s metaphysics.
Disappointed,
Crow
Yeah. What crow said. I don’t want unfunny immaturity — only genuine undiluted immaturity, or unadultered unfunniness, for me. None of those modern “blends” and “combos” the kids like.
nice.
… I can has protein folding collaborative grid processing node?
Mike,
This is ScienceBlogs, not myspace. You’re dragging science down with this sort of unfunny immaturity. Please stick to freshman-who-just-read-Nietzsche critiques of other people’s metaphysics.
Disappointed,
Crow
Crow:
You must be a blast at parties.
Scientists are not robots – sometimes we (gasp!) even enjoy a stupid joke now and then…
Mike and Troff: awesome.
Wisaakah –
Scientists are not robots…
Nope, not buyin’ it. All the evidence points to scientists being robots with lazer eyes. . .
Yeah. What crow said. I don’t want unfunny immaturity — only genuine undiluted immaturity, or unadultered unfunniness, for me. None of those modern “blends” and “combos” the kids like.