Professional Democrats Do Need to Fix the Things They Can Control

When it comes to something like an election, much of the outcome is determined by events and forces that are beyond a candidate’s or party’s control. That said, professional Democrats do have agency and desperately need to make changes in the things they do control (boldface mine):

The party lacks any sort of cohesive information architecture or strategy and leaders of the party holding elected office are lackadaisical about communicating with the public – and when they do bother to speak out, the language and methods are archaic most of the time. Even if the media and social environment were perfect, the party would have problems communicating in this mess, so it’s even worse since the environment is a toxic garbage dump.

When they’re not communicating competently the party is also governing and legislating incompetently. Democrats may be America’s liberal party, but they are beholden to a conservative approach. The party is disinterested in proposing legislation designed to advance its ideological goals, preferring instead to only back legislation that has a realistic chance to pass, rather than backing bills designed to fail which would elicit friction with the other side – activating support from voters. At the same time, the party legislates as if bipartisanship is the end goal, rather than providing policies and services to help people. And then it stinks at communicating the benefits of those policies to people.

This was the party that Biden then Harris led, and it had these same problems – or some variation of them – under Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, as well as the eras when it was out of the White House and in the minority.

Acknowledging these problems and working to fix them is not undermining the party. America is (for now at least) a two-party country and it needs a competent Democratic Party to hold off the menace within the Republican Party.

It’s impossible to control everything, but professional Democrats could end the bad behavior Willis identifies–if they so chose. So far, they haven’t.

Then again, I’m old enough to remember when rank-and-file Democrats had to fight our own party to get them to protect Social Security which is the signature safety net program of the Democratic Party. It gets tiresome after a while.

At some point, even diehards are going to start wondering if their money and time (voting is pretty easy in many, not all, places) are better spent on something other than the same old Democrats.

This entry was posted in Democrats. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Professional Democrats Do Need to Fix the Things They Can Control

  1. Danneau says:

    When the desire to get elected supersedes the imperative to legislate improvements for citizens, the constituent assemblies devolve into self-serving circuses. There are currently wholesale examples of this all over the globe, where politics displaces governance.

  2. Anne Nonymous says:

    The Democrats are the USA’s “liberal” party only in the “classical” sense. About the only difference between the Democrats today and the Republicans of the 1950s is on gay rights, which pretty much weren’t mentioned at all back then. The majority of Democratic politicians in the 50s were probably less progressive on civil rights for people of color than Republicans of that era. They’ve already accepted partial privatization of Medicare and have expressed some “flexibility” on Social Security, the only major programs that are arguably “leftist”. If he were alive today, Eisenhower would be the professional Dems ideal candidate, including his immigration policy. Hell, Trump could have run as a Democrat with just a few tweaks!

  3. John says:

    Let’s face it. They won’t do the right thing. Any time the right thing is brought up, it’s either ignored or dismissed.

    “Nyeah nyeah! Look at what we can do, and you can’t do a damn thing about it.”

  4. LanceThruster says:

    Dems, particularly in the blogosphere, continue to blame the usual suspects (racism, misogyny, the MSM). They speak of outreach as they’ve purged those progressive voices that got it right (GOP-Lite and pro-genocide was a bridge too far). I’m not optimistic as Establishment Dem leadership maintains their death-grip on the party.

  5. Pingback: In Case You Missed It… | Mike the Mad Biologist

Comments are closed.