Democratic Voters Are Better Than, but Many Are Still Bad

And we need to recognize that. Last week, this poll came across the transom:


As you might imagine, it was correctly viewed as bigotry. Then the polling outfit broke this down by party affiliation:


While most people were focusing on Republicans–three out of four don’t want MUSLIMANIAN! numbers–Democrats didn’t do so well either. After all, thirty percent of Democrats don’t want MUSLIMANIAN! numbers. Not awesome. Which gives us a reason to shout into the wind once more about the reality of too many Democratic voters:

Democrats dwelled on the most obvious–and politically convenient–part–which indicates that Trump supporters are a lot more racist than anyone else. But this figure also contains an inconvenient truth (to use a phrase)… I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume that one in four Democrats is racist–which admittedly is better than Republicans, especially once the Trumpists are factored in. We, too, have our deplorables.

As Kweku notes, however, these racists are still willing to vote for Democrats in spite of and in opposition to their racism. Figure out why they do so, and then do more of that.

…I’m not going Full Metal Ron Fournier and claiming ‘both sides do it’: clearly, one side does it much more than the other. Moreover, the Republican Party is dog whistling, not to mention air-raid sirening, to racists, while the Democratic Party openly espouses anti-racist policies (always could do more, but there is a difference in kind here).

If the Democratic racists stayed home, Democrats would be hard pressed to win 100 House seats (out of 435), and maybe control governorships in five states (no way Democrats reach ten). Of course, if all racists stayed home, Democrats would run the table on Republicans. The point is not to pander to the racists, but figure out why they are voting Democratic in spite of their racism.

…While much of the discussion often revolves around presidential dynamics (I’m guilty of this too), it’s the states where often the most retrograde policies are enacted. To win back states and thereby help Democratic strongholds, Democrats have no choice but to convince these voters to show up (or at least not vote Republican).

Finally, one more point: often the argument is phrased as ‘appealing to racists’, as if this doesn’t happen. Democrats already do appeal to some racists, in spite of their racism. Yes, I would like the scourge of racism to be eradicated, but that’s kind of a long-term project–think pulpits, not politics, for that. In the meantime, the question is do we want racists to vote for or against their racism?

The question pretty much answers itself.

Making better people is really hard, but convincing somewhat, erm, deplorable people to enter into a coalition with you, not so much. Something to keep in mind over the next eighteen months.

This entry was posted in Conservatives, Democrats, Racism. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Democratic Voters Are Better Than, but Many Are Still Bad

  1. Adam Eran says:

    “I would like the scourge of racism to be eradicated,”

    …that’s *never* happening. Prejudice is integral to human perception. That’s right, racism is a natural extension of that willingness to use mental shorthand to perceive the world. It’s hard wired, too. Only 10% of your visual cortex receives data (the optical nerve), the rest is connected to memory and language.

    We need to take our natural racism less seriously. Resisting or “eradicating” it is futile and counterproductive. Censorship–stuff like the “n” word–just makes it more powerful. What you resist will persist.

    • jonolan says:

      Yep, and studies have even showed that infants gravitate towards others who look like them and away from ones that don’t.

      Frankly, “racism” is a good and necessary thing in so long as people only use those shortcuts in a proviso sort of way – a shortcut to make quick defensive decisions that they have the ability and will to override when and if provided more or different data.

  2. jonolan says:

    Well, given both the ever-devolving nature of identitarian SJWs and terms that I recently heard used in documentaries – about math(s) of all things, the Democrats’ response may be because the new “culturally appropriate” and/or politically correct term for those numbers is the Hindu or Hindu-Arabic Numeral System. 🙄

    But hey! Even the “Arabic” part is something of a shortcut, and a less than perfectly accurate one, since the main proponent of those numerals in the Muslim World was a Persian, not an Arab.

Comments are closed.