So Gallup re-released its poll on LGBT identification, and broke the data down by state:
Yes, Washington D.C. has ten percent of respondents identifying as LGBT (after surveying ~0.9% of the total population),
and half of them work for the RNC. I kid about the latter, although it’s an open secret that the closet is quite large on that side of the aisle (in the 1990s, they used to call themselves the “Laissez Fairies”). Seriously though, it’s not surprising that professional social conservatives based in Washington are very concerned that the U.S. is being overrun with gays and lesbians, because, where they live, well, there are a lot of people who identify as LGBT. Not that this excuses the bigotry, but it does highlight the odd local effects of Washington per se on the national discourse (something also seen in discussions of public education where people focus on the D.C. public schools, the worst in the U.S. Oddly enough, the ineptitude that passes for the D.C. government is ignored when the virtues of local government are discussed. But I digress).
But there’s something about the table that really puzzles me. Here’s a hint: add the two columns together. They never sum up to 100 percent. In some states, the “don’t know/refused” are slightly over six percent. I get that people will lie about this–the identification percentage is best seen as the percent who will publicly admit to being LGBT. But to not answer? You don’t know? How is that possible? (nationally, this is 4.4.% of respondents). I would think many in denial, would lie affirmatively as opposed to not answering.
This is a pretty fundamental question too. There isn’t a lot of room for misinterpretation or bad wording unlike some questions*. Basically, you know. I’m not sure how you disentangle people refusing to answer because they are just very private people versus actual uncertainty versus an unwillingness to identify as LGBT, but the data indicating Hispanics and African-Americans have higher “don’t know/refused” rates than whites, while at the same time also having higher LGBT identification rates suggest there is perhaps some denial going on.
So, nationally, 3.4% of Americans identify as LGBT, but I wonder if the actual frequency is much higher. Alternatively, there is a lot more sexual ambiguity than most discussions are willing to entertain.
*For example, on polls that ask if there should be no restrictions on abortion, I would have to answer no, since I think there should be some, few, limited restrictions. But I don’t think regular readers would consider me to be anything other than staunchly pro-legal and safe abortion.