No Doubt Curriculum and Training Problems Can Be Fixed With Union Busting and Value-Added Testing

This will help science education (boldface mine):

But despite such broad acceptance that the nation’s economy needs more professionals in the hard sciences, a new report reveals that elementary schools in the nation’s most populated state are barely teaching the subject.

“Children in California’s elementary schools rarely have the opportunity to engage in high-quality science learning because the conditions that would support such opportunities are rarely in place,” says Rena Dorph, a researcher at the Lawrence Hall of Science at the University of California at Berkeley. Dorph and her colleagues found that although 90 percent of school principals and parents say science education is very important and should begin early, 40 percent of elementary teachers said they spent an hour or less per week teaching science last year. Thirteen percent taught the subject for less than 30 minutes a week.

The bulk of science instruction in California begins in fifth grade because that is the year state standardized tests begin measuring science knowledge. This means that by the time they get there, students are already behind in the fundamental science content they should know. This makes them less likely to perform well in their science classes, which discourages them from pursuing science academically or as a career.

Why might this be? Hmmm:

Teachers told researchers that they love teaching science and their students enjoy it, but because of the pressure to meet federal and state accountability targets, they’re forced to spend the bulk of their time teaching English and math. More than 90 percent of teachers say they have limited time to teach science, and 81 percent cited the emphasis on English language arts and math as a contributing factor.

Call this another stunning success for valueadded testing. But this is the really frustrating part:

Even if they did have time to tackle the subject, 85 percent of teachers say they haven’t had any professional development in science education over the past three years. And thanks to budget cuts, 70 percent say they have limited funds to purchase the supplies they need to properly teach the content. Schools serving low-income students are hit the hardest: Only 33 percent of the state’s poorest schools host science education initiatives, compared to 68 percent of schools in wealthier areas.

That Which Must Not Be Named, professional development (AAAIIIEEEE!!!!) is a problem. Instead, we get the flimflammery of treating poor student performance as a personnel problem.

This is not helping.

This entry was posted in Education. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to No Doubt Curriculum and Training Problems Can Be Fixed With Union Busting and Value-Added Testing

  1. george.w says:

    Learning goes faster when kids are interested. Very few kids are interested in English and math for their own sakes, but because they give us access to cool stuff, like science. It would be like spending five years learning about hammers and saws, then beginning actual carpentry on year six. By then you’re ready to ditch the whole thing!

Comments are closed.