A Tale of Two Healthcare Tax Deductions

Or perhaps, health insurance deductions–of mice and men. In response to McCain’s healthcare proposal, during the 2008 election, I laid out why tax deductions (or even credits) are a stupid healthcare policy. While I think it’s foolish, at least, it attempts to be serious. But this is why I can’t take Republican policy initiatives seriously:

Republican Congressman Thaddeus McCotter has proposed the Humanity and Pets Partnered Through the Years (HAPPY) Act.
McCotter’s HAPPY Act would allow pet owners to take a $3,500 tax deduction for expenses related to pet and veterinary care.
As an avid pet-lover, I have no problem with this particular bill. However, I have a BIG problem with the Republican Party’s priorities.

I like pets: THEY CAN HAZ HELFCARES!!! So how much do humans get? What do you think:

When tackling health insurance reform for humans, Republicans are far less generous. Varying Republican plans offer individual tax credits of only $2,500 or $2,290 to help Americans purchase health insurance on their own.

cat
We are so far beyond arguing about reimbursement rates–we have crossed over into the looney zone.

This entry was posted in Conservatives, Healthcare. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A Tale of Two Healthcare Tax Deductions

  1. JasonTD says:

    A tax deduction is far less valuable than a tax credit. A tax credit goes to reduce the amount of tax you owe, a deduction reduces the amount of taxable income.

  2. Yep, good catch, JasonTD. It’s still kind of stupid to give people deductions for pet health care, though.

Comments are closed.