Federal Court Overturns Texas Law That Would Shrink Government to the Size Where It Would Fit in a Woman’s Vagina

By way of Digby, we find some good news on the civil liberties front:

A federal judge today found that the Texas “sonogram law” violates the First Amendment and blocked enforcement of important provisions of the statute. This law would have forced women seeking to terminate a pregnancy to undergo a medically unnecessary and intrusive transvaginal sonogram. According to the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), which brought the case, the was certified against the law as a class action, and a preliminary injunction was granted until those areas of the case can be resolved. The Center filed a class action lawsuit against the new ultrasound requirements on June 13 on behalf of Texas medical providers performing abortions and their patients.

Judge Sam Sparks ruled that doctors cannot be penalized if they do not show a woman seeking an abortion the sonogram images, describe those images to her or play the sound of the fetal heart, if the woman declines this information.

It’s good to see someone is disgusted by the specter of governmentally mandated vaginal intrusion that serves no medical purpose. It’s kind of torture-ish.

Of course, the theopolitical right is babbling lots of nonsense, which the judge also smacked down:

This time, however, it seems Sparks is getting a bit perturbed. In rejecting the latest attempt to file a friend-of-the-court brief, written by anti-abortion lawyer Allan Parker, with the Justice Foundation, on “behalf of 317 Texas Women Hurt By Abortion,” Sparks did not mince words – especially in responding to Parker’s filing of a host of exhibits, including the picture of a “first-trimester aborted child,” according to a list of the appendices, which Sparks has placed under seal.

“The Court has already turned down two extremely tempting offers to transform this case from a boring old federal lawsuit into an exciting, politically-charged media circus,” he wrote. “As any competent attorney could have predicted, the Court declines this latest invitation as well.”

Moreover, Sparks continued that he concludes Parker is not competent: “the Court is forced to conclude Allan E. Parker, Jr., the attorney whose signature appears on this motion, is anything but competent,” he wrote. “A competent attorney would not have filed this motion in the first place; if he did, he certainly would not have attached exhibits that are both highly prejudicial and legally irrelevant; and if he foolishly did both things, he surely would not be so unprofessional as to file such exhibits unsealed.”
Alas, that’s exactly what Parker did.

(the order can be found here)

Let’s see: egregious First Amendment violations? Check? Unprofessional shenanigans? Check? Theopolitical wackaloonery? You betcha!

Sounds a lot like when creationism hits the courtroom, doesn’t it?

Remember: nothing in movement conservatism makes sense except in the light of creationism.

This entry was posted in Blastocyst Liberation, Civil Liberties, Conservatives, Creationism. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Federal Court Overturns Texas Law That Would Shrink Government to the Size Where It Would Fit in a Woman’s Vagina

  1. coeruleus says:

    Heh! Nice place you got here! As a welcome, I’ll leave you a link you might enjoy reading and pondering about:

    http://www.genengnews.com/gen-articles/revamping-research-funding/3778/

  2. P A A Forbes says:

    Certainly excellent news for the women of Texas. A hearty “huzzah” for Judge Sparks.

    As a resident of Ohio, I am waiting to see what happens with the ludicrous “heartbeat” bill that got passed.

    • evodevo says:

      Yeah, I’ve been wondering about that too. During their little demonstration during a legislative session, they couldn’t detect a heartbeat on the earliest fetus/embryo or whatever. Pwnd, I guess. So, according to the bill, if there is no heartbeat, there is no problem? Or what? Or do these people even think that far out of their tiny little box?

      • katefromiowa says:

        Wasn’t even the earliest they’d planned to make it, if I remember right, they weren’t able to actually find anyone that er…recently impregnated. Thier volunteers were all some weeks after thier desired magic date. Tells you all you need to about what they’re pushing for right there…they want to make it illegal to get an abortion before it’s even possible for most women to have realised they’re pregnant in the first place.

  3. tushcloots says:

    Allen Parker is only an apprentice theopolitical whackaloon. A journeyman would have also submitted bible scripture as evidence.

Comments are closed.